What Croydon actually refuses on
Transport is Croydon’s most-cited refusal category, and the first-listed reason in 31 of 483 refusals. Design is the leading primary ground.
Perfect Scale studies what happens when housing policy meets the planning system. We build datasets from planning decisions, use them to test questions about how the system behaves, and publish what we find.
London does not operate one planning system for small sites.
Once differences in the applications each borough receives are accounted for, a wide gap in outcomes remains. The distance between the two ends of the distribution is 43.6 percentage points.
Mix-adjusted outcome differential: each borough’s approval rate against what London-average decision behaviour would have produced on that borough’s own caseload, holding scheme type, unit count, conservation status and transport accessibility constant. 11,689 decided applications across the 32 authorities with complete covariates. Descriptive, not causal.
The London Small Sites Dataset
Every residential planning application for one to nine homes across London’s 33 planning authorities, recorded to a common method.
What are we trying to find out?
Policy is an experiment.
A policy is introduced because somebody expects it to change what people do. Applicants respond, officers decide, schemes proceed or fail.
Those responses leave a record. Perfect Scale uses it to test what happened.
Transport is Croydon’s most-cited refusal category, and the first-listed reason in 31 of 483 refusals. Design is the leading primary ground.
A published finding on pre-application advice turned out to be measuring the way the data was collected. The retraction, and what would answer the question properly.
Across 11,689 decided applications in 32 boroughs, the gap between the most permissive and most restrictive authority runs to 43.6 percentage points once caseload mix is held constant.
If you are working on housing or planning and there is a factual question the record might help answer, get in touch.