London Borough of Westminster

How Westminster decides on small housing schemes

Every decision on sites of nine units or fewer, coded from the council's own register and refreshed each quarter. What gets built, what gets approved, and what trips applications up.

Last updated April 2026 407 applications tracked Window: Jan 2023 to Mar 2026 8 areas, 5 scheme types
Applications logged
407
Full, householder and minor resi since Jan 2023
Decided so far
342
280 approved, 62 refused, 32 withdrawn
Approval rate
82%
Roughly four in five decided applications
Typical time to decide
12 weeks
Median determination time across all small sites

Westminster, area by area

Colour shows how often applications get approved. Numbers show how many were decided. Hover or tap an area for detail.

St John's Wood & Maida Vale 27 Paddington & North Westminster 68 Marylebone 50 Bayswater & Lancaster Gate 48 Mayfair & West End 61 St James's & Whitehall 31 Knightsbridge & Belgravia 29 Pimlico & Victoria 28 Approval rate 70% 92%
Spotlight

St John's Wood & Maida Vale

Decisions
27
Approved
19
Refused
8
Approval rate
70%
Hover or tap any tile to see that area’s detail.
Tile positions are schematic, not to geographic scale. Each hex represents one of Westminster’s sub-areas as defined in the council’s own planning framework.

Marylebone approves 92% of applications. St John's Wood & Maida Vale, closer to 70%. Same borough, same policy, 22 percentage points of difference.

Which kinds of schemes get approved?

Bar length shows how many of each type were decided. The split shows the share approved versus refused. Conversion is by far the most common route in Westminster, but it's mid-terrace that sees the highest approval rate.

Approved Refused Bar length = sample size (max n=148)
Conversion
79%n=148
Demolish & rebuild
77%n=56
Extension
75%n=24
Mid-terrace
83%n=24
Infill
40%n=10
Scheme types with fewer than 10 decisions in the window are not shown here.
Conversion, dividing one home into flats
Demolish & rebuild, existing building replaced with new homes
Extension, rear, side or upward additions creating a new unit
Mid-terrace, insertion into the middle of a terrace
Infill, new build on small pockets of land

Why applications fail in Westminster

Of every hundred reasons cited in refused decisions in Westminster, design quality accounts for the biggest slice at 31%.

Design quality, bulk, massing, appearance 31
Amenity, overlooking, daylight, noise 26
Infrastructure, access, parking, drainage 16
Other, mixed reasons 11
Policy, affordable housing, density targets 11
Unit sizes, below space standards 5
Read as: “Of every 100 reasons cited in a refusal, 31 relate to design quality.” A single refusal often names two or more reasons. Based on 19 reasons extracted from refused decision notices.

In Westminster, what gets a scheme refused is usually how it looks, not how many homes it adds.

Is Westminster getting busier?

Decisions per quarter have grown since 2023, and approval rates have stayed in the same band over the same window.

Decisions per quarter
Approval rate (%)
0 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% borough avg 82% '23 Q2 · 89% · n=18 '23 Q3 · 63% · n=19 '23 Q4 · 82% · n=22 '24 Q1 · 85% · n=20 '24 Q2 · 70% · n=23 '24 Q3 · 86% · n=28 '24 Q4 · 67% · n=27 '25 Q1 · 76% · n=25 '25 Q2 · 72% · n=32 '25 Q3 · 89% · n=36 '25 Q4 · 86% · n=22 '26 Q1 · 95% · n=19 '26 Q2 · 96% · n=46 '23 Q2 '23 Q3 '23 Q4 '24 Q1 '24 Q2 '24 Q3 '24 Q4 '25 Q1 '25 Q2 '25 Q3 '25 Q4 '26 Q1 '26 Q2
Hover any bar or dot for exact quarterly values. The most recent quarter may be partial while pending decisions work through.

Interrogate the data yourself

Every figure on this page comes from Westminster's own planning decisions. We publish the underlying data so you can check it, replicate our findings, or use it in your own tools. Verify against the council's planning portal before relying on any record, and tell us if you spot a problem.

Decided small-site applications, 1 to 9 units. Planning-decision layer only: Energy Performance Certificate, Land Registry and case-officer fields are held back. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Methodology.

Thinking about a specific site?

The dashboard gives you the borough picture. If you’re weighing a particular site, the Red Line Review is an independent second opinion before you commit six figures — one sentence on what I’d do if it were my money, and why.

Data sources & method

Applications. Sourced from the Greater London Authority (GLA) Planning Datahub and Westminster Council’s online planning register. Covers full planning, householder, and minor residential applications of nine units or fewer decided in the window shown above.

Decisions and timing. Outcomes and determination times are taken from the council’s published decision notices.

Refusal reasons. Extracted from refused decision notices that were publicly available. Not every refusal has a readable notice, so totals count all refusals but the reason breakdown covers only those we could read.

Scheme classification. Site types (conversion, demolish & rebuild, extension, and so on) are coded from application descriptions and drawings. Areas are mapped from postcodes and ward names using the council’s own sub-area definitions.

Update frequency. Refreshed quarterly. Next refresh: July 2026.

Nothing here is planning advice. Outcomes are historical and do not predict individual cases. Approval rates vary with site specifics, policy context, and case officer. For a read on a particular site, request a Red Line Review. See our Terms of Use for full details on how this data is compiled and the limits of its use.